japan property agencyThe State Council decided

Why did the property tax not expand after the Shanghai-Shanghai pilot japan property agency? japan property agencyThe State Council decided to conduct a property tax pilot in Shanghai and Chongqing in 2011, and gradually learned the lessons in the pilot project through the gradual approach, and copied and promoted it in the next step. However,japan property agency although the pilot reform of Humin has achieved certain results, it is still largely inconsistent with expectations, which has led to the stagnation of China’s property tax pilot promotion work, resulting in the delay of the entire property tax reform. 2.1. The reform of the two places has different emphasis and different division of labor. The real estate market in Shanghai and Chongqing differs greatly. Therefore, the focus of the two places is different in policy design, but they all have obvious characteristics, that is, extensive in the Yangtze River Delta and Central China. Radiation effect. Specifically: Chongqing taxation targets mainly villas, newly purchased high-end housing and two non-employed people in the field (more than the first and third houses in 2017). It is not difficult to see that the precision is the luxury purchase. High-end housing owners and capital speculators. And Chongqing’s policy covers local stocks, the market transaction price is easy to determine, and the pilot is more meaningful from the perspective of regulating housing prices. Shanghai japan property agency has a wider tax target, involving more than two sets of Shanghai residents and non-residents. New home purchases cover a wider range of people but are limited to incremental homes rather than stocks. The starting point of the design of the two places is to ensure the immediate needs  of local housing,Sexually curb property speculation, but the strength and strength of the concessions are limited. 2.2. The tax system design is unreasonable, and the tax rate is too low. The Shanghai-Shanghai pilot has pioneering significance, but it also exposes the lack of experience and design flaws. The scope of taxation is narrow: the taxation object of the Shanghai pilot program only includes increments that do not involve stocks. Therefore, property owners with multiple properties before the pilot will not be included in the taxation scope; although the Chongqing pilot program involves increments and involves stocks,japan property agency it does not involve a large number of ordinary houses owned by Chongqing residents. The tax basis is unreasonable: the international practice is based on the property valuation value. The theoretical taxation basis for the Shanghai-Shanghai pilot policy is the property evaluation value, but the technical conditions are not mature. The initial changes are based on the market transaction price, and Shanghai is taxed at 70% on the basis of the transaction price.japan property agency In theory, the taxation of the assessed value can reflect the taxpayer’s real estate holding cost more fairly and objectively. On the one hand, there is no transaction price reference for the house before the housing commercialization reform, and on the other hand, avoiding the “yin and yang contract” and other illegal practices in the real estate transaction. Tax evasion. And according to the evaluation value, the government can obtain the appreciation of the value of the property caused by the provision of public facilities, and better protect the tax source. Tax rate is too low, tax-free area is too large

http://www.daikyo.com.hk/en/buy/mansion/z?featureArea=true